Dream Gardens and Real Gardens: a Thought on Marriage (a lesson from the Apocryphal story of Susanna)

In the beginning the LORD planted a garden. The first human being was placed there. And God caused every kind of tree and plant to grow there nourished by the river running through. It was an incredibly fertile place that ‘adam was given to work and care for. Indeed, from that fertile earth, God formed wild beasts and birds of the sky! And in that rich place of life, where all things seemed to live in right relationship with each other, the LORD drew two out of one: male and female out of that single ‘adam.

These two, described in Genesis 2.24 as becoming “one flesh”, existed in paradise in what must be understood as an ideal, life-giving and loving relationship. In many ways the Song of Songs gives us a sense of this kind of garden-based loving relationship as the poem uses much natural, outdoors, and fertile imagery to describe the experience of the two lovers. The garden is used over and again to poetically describe the lovers’ coming together as one flesh. See this from the Song 6.2-3:

“My beloved has gone down to his garden; to the beds of spices; to browse in the garden and pick the lilies. I am my beloved’s, and my beloved is mine…”

The garden is a place of luscious life and love! The natural and fertile imagery of the garden is both a location for love and an articulation of it. Most lovers have at some point felt as though they were:

“The only two of mankind in the happy garden plac’d, reaping immortal fruits of joy and love, uninterrupted joy, unrivall’d love, in blissful solitude” (Milton, Paradise Lost, Book III)

However, this experience of the garden is a dream. Try as we might to manipulate ideal long-term relationships by utilising such imagery, the paradise garden is inaccessible to us as a permanent reality. Temptation made its way into Eden to be followed by division, blame and death. Even that garden-love of The Song of Songs is encircled by nightmares of separation and violence, and the threat of “the little foxes that ruin the vineyards” (Song 2.15). And, in the Apocryphal story of Susanna, there is another garden in which a much more realistic and familiar experience is depicted.

Briefly then: Joakim has done alright out of the Babylonian exile, apparently reading Jeremiah 29 which tells the exiles to build houses, plant gardens, marry and have children. He is married to the very beautiful and pious Susanna. Joakim also has this great house with “a fine garden” (v.4), which serves as a community centre. Indeed, “the Jews used to come to him because he was the most honoured of them all” (v.4). Two of those always at Joakim’s place hearing legal cases, are the two elders who had been appointed as judges.

Anyway, “when the people left at noon, Susanna would go into her husband’s garden to walk. Every day the two elders used to see her going in and walking about, and they began to lust for her” (vv.7-8).

There is a lot to draw from this passage. Thinking about the garden as place of life and love between two, we might instantly detect a danger sign in that Joakim is absent. This is not to suggest that Susanna necessarily needs the accompaniment of her husband to be “complete” (*however, his presence would have been helpful given what was about to happen…*), but just that the imagery of the garden seems to resonate most fully with regards two lovers joined by divine mystery as one flesh.

However, even alone, there may still be an opportunity for Susanna to thrive in the nourishing, life-giving location of the garden. In the public arena that is the house of Joakim, the garden serves as a private space where Susanna need not be on display as the wife of this great man of the community. There, by green pastures and still waters she may have her soul restored and discover something of who she is created to be in the Image of God, that is, not simply the “very beautiful and pious” wife of Joakim.

But, she is not permitted to simply exist, receiving nourishment from the garden as, Susanna is observed. Much like the serpent watching and waiting for Eve with evil intent, the elders notice the beautiful Susanna in a way that perhaps only men can notice a woman. This is an excellent depiction of ways that “sin” develops within us: maybe at first the two elders saw her and appreciated her appearance, but as the days pass by and they see her “going in [the garden] and walking about”; the sin takes root, expands and affects mind and body. Now, they are infatuated and perceive her to be purposely parading herself before them… wanting to be noticed by them.

This is how the minds of men can operate. Lustful eyes and hearts fostering infatuation, obsession and fantasy until one day the elders hide themselves in the garden and spring out on Susanna saying: “Lie with us. If you refuse we will testify that a young man was with you” (v.21). And just like that, Susanna is trapped knowing, as do the elders, that the penalty for adultery is death. Who will believe her testimony over that of two elders who are also judges?

The life-giving garden has now become a place of temptation, accusation and death. And it is not only the threat of the death penalty over an adultery charge. It is also the case that the elders have long ceased to view Susanna as any kind of whole person. She is merely a body they want to use. And as such, she has been dehumanised to the point that she may as well be dead. The garden was never supposed to host such tragedy as this.

Susanna screams out and is indeed tried for adultery with the imaginary “young man”. Luckily for her, another young man called Daniel, annointed with wisdom, cries foul and proves the false testimony of the elders who are put to death instead of Susanna. Hooray!

But still, some innate goodness, some purity, has been stolen from the garden by what has happened within its boundaries. And this can so often be true in our own loving relationships where all kinds of “sin” are allowed to take root and grow within us resulting in temptation, accusation and a spiritual death. If the elders of the story represent to us this “sin” in whatever form it finds each individual at our most vulnerable, we can perhaps appreciate the need for two who have been joined as one flesh to remain as spiritually together as possible. This requires a great deal of patience, kindness… wait, hang on (please see 1 Corinthians 13.4-8)!

Experiencing the richness of the biblical garden from our position east of Eden must surely remain a possibility; but it will require long-term commitment to a self-giving love from both in the relationship that may over time be increasingly challenging and demanding to engage with because of bad habits, familiarity, laziness, and so on. Ultimately though, the opportunity to enjoy the luscious fruits of the paradise garden wholly united as two-become-one, is surely worth striving and fighting for. 

Maternal Imagery in the story of Deborah (Judges 4-5)

In the Song of Deborah in Judges 5 which follows her story in chapter 4, Deborah is described as “O Mother in Israel” (5.7). Looking at the two chapters together, it is clear that there are various maternal images scattered across the record of events involving Deborah.

First, there is the way in which Deborah “mothers” Barak. It is not clear why he is chosen to lead the attack against Sisera and the 900 iron chariots, but it quickly becomes apparent that Barak needs the presence and protection of Deborah and will not go and fight without her. More than this though, and somewhat like a teenage boy struggling to find his way out in the world – or even out of his bedroom, Barak also seems to require a certain maternal type of organising! So, in 4.14 Deborah arrives at his tent saying: Come on! Get Up! Out of bed! It is time to go and win this battle!

This would seem to be natural to Deborah as she has already served as a kind of mother to Israel under the palm tree offering advice and solving problems. There is something about listening to a mother’s wisdom in Proverbs 1.8 and 31.1 that Deborah seems to embody: put simply, she possesses that divinely-inspired wisdom associated in the Bible with mothers. Note also that her prophecy of 4.9 comes is fulfilled quickly by Jael in 4.21.

But Deborah is not the only maternal figure in the story. When the battle is won by Israel, the Canaanite army commander Sisera flees on foot to the tent of Jael. She welcomes him and “cover[s] him with a blanket” (4.18). Sisera requests water and receives instead some comforting milk. Jael covers him again with the blanket so that Sisera can sleep comfy and cosy. These nurturing actions remind of the maternal, with Sisera appearing as a weary young boy coming home after a long day playing out with his friends.

OK, then Jael drives a tent peg through Sisera’s head and we discover that her pseudo-maternal, comforting actions have been just a ploy to destroy an enemy of Israel. And from the perspective of ancient Israel, Jael is a hero! Just like Judith with Holofernes and Esther with Haman, Jael has boldly acted for the good of her people (*looking at things the opposite way round, we might also say that Delilah does the same by delivering Samson to her people, the Philistines*).

Then, in Deborah’s song of Judges 5 there is a sad picture of Sisera’s mother waiting by her window, wondering why he has not returned home . Forever hopeful, she tells herself that maybe he is delayed because he is busy dividing up the booty of the latest city he has been plundering (5.28-30). Now, there is a comic picture in my mind of the mighty Sisera with his 900 iron chariots, coming home to his beloved mother at the end of each day. And in a Monty Python style touch, I see him seated at the dinner table, still in his armour, telling his proud mum all about that day’s exploits killing, pillaging, etc… 

Anyway, it is interesting to me that the Deborah story is so full of maternal imagery. Not only evident with Deborah, as “Mother in Israel”, but with all the female characters in various ways. I think that reflection upon this feature of the Judges story might lead us on to consider the character of our God who, while so often understood as mighty warrior or Father, is throughout scripture described as demonstrating more nurturing, maternal characteristics.

I noted Deborah’s wisdom. We know that divine wisdom is often personified as a woman in books such as Proverbs and the Apocryphal Wisdom of Solomon. This Lady Wisdom is characterised as a sister (Prov. 7.4) and a bride (Wis. 8.2), but I wonder if there is also something of the mother about wisdom. Divine wisdom is regularly associated with creation (e.g. Prov. 3.19-20; 8.22-30) and life (Prov. 3.18-22; 8.35); both of which we would connect with a mother: life is created inside the mother’s womb and she brings new life into the world. The creative, life-giving force that flows from God, is also present so powerfully in a mother.

Indeed, Deuteronomy 32.18 describes how the LORD gave birth to Israel with some evocative language of writhing and pain. Then in Isaiah 49.15, the LORD says, “can a woman forget the child she has birthed? Even if she could forget, I will never forget you”. These verses together suggest something of the deep and unfathomable bonds between mother and child/God and humanity. She has grown the child inside of their own body and experienced the immensity of bringing new life into the world. That child has been completely dependent upon her for nourishment and nurture and then, as it grow, seeks to go its own way.

It would appear that the experience of bringing about new life is of such magnitude, that the maternal nature and desire to nurture and protect cannot be broken. And here I find a way to draw something divine out of the difficult relationship between Jael’s maternal nurture of Sisera and her violent destruction of his life as an enemy to Israel!

There is a moment when Jesus looks over Jerusalem and expresses his desire to protect the city like a hen sheltering chicks under her wing (Luke 13.34). Here the Son of God approaches the maternal nature of the Father who had said through the prophet, “As a mother comforts her son, so I will comfort you” (Isaiah 66.13). This is the drive to nurture and protect which God as Mother experiences about her own children.

Of course, the need to protect suggests that there is some danger. That is point about Sisera; he represents that ever-present danger to God’s beloved children and Jael, enacting the fierce maternal drive to protect, destroys the danger. It is something we see through Scripture as Israel is attacked on all sides but God rises up to deliver them time and again; and then of course, in the great sacrifice of Jesus Christ to ultimately remove that danger from God’s children once and for all. Mothers, earthly or divine, we might say, can be deeply nurturing, but like a wild animal when it comes to defending her offspring!

Finally, now thinking about Sisera’s mother who waits, ever hopeful, by the window. Again, we can relate this hopeful waiting back to the immensity of being a bringer of life. The bonds between mother and child seem to suggest that a mother will forever wait in hope for her child’s return; however old that child may have grown to be and whatever mistakes they might have made. In Luke 15 we have a picture, often connected with God, of a father waiting for his prodigal son. There is no mother in the parable and I might suggest that this single Dad has had to try and be both father and mother to the two sons, hence his taking on the maternal role of waiting by the window (*we could contrast this with Tobias’ mother in the book of Tobit waiting desperately for her son’s return*). And in fact this may be understood as a divine maternal role of lovingly waiting in hope.

Among the many, many ways in which our Lord relates to humanity, God relates powerfully to that experience of the mother. Whatever we may be going through in our own relationship with God – maybe a time of revelation; rebuke and discipline; extreme closeness or perceived distance – I feel that it will serve us well to also recall the divine maternal character which, no matter what happens, will always be positioned towards our ultimate good.

God is the bringer of life, just as a mother is a bringer of life. It is interesting to me how such a crucial link is so often overlooked. Perhaps we fear that applying feminine characteristics to God will cause our whole faith to come crashing down. We might remember that God chose to align the divine character with these maternal images in the first place!

Unexpected Signs of the Ascension in Judges 3.12-30: a thought in preparation for Ascension Day 2020

This week the Church traditionally remembers the ascension of Jesus to heaven as it is forty days since Easter (see Acts 1.3). Now, the actual moment of ascension is briefly described: “[Jesus] was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their eyes” (Acts 1.9)

Of course every ounce of our twenty-first century being cries, “NO! Real people are not carried up into the clouds!”. And it seems we must either compartmentalise it as simply an ancient writer’s attempt to describe something in a culturally/religiously relevant way (e.g. references to the prophet Daniel’s visions of the Son of Man, and the first century ideas that the souls of deceased Roman emperors were carried up into the skies); or perhaps engage with “a spirit of wisdom and revelation” (Ephesians 1.17) in order to appreciate the divine mystery that is Christ’s ascension.

Whatever the details of how/when he actually ascended, the New Testament is fairly consistent in its witness to the fact that Jesus Christ did ascend to heaven and is seated at the right hand of God, the highest place of honour and glory (e.g. Acts 2.32-33; Ephesians 1.20-23; Hebrews 12.2).

The thing about the Ascension is that it is an upwards motion. Just as Jesus was raised up from death to life, he has also been lifted up to heaven, “far above all rule and authority” (Ephesians 1.21). We need not think purely of a physical lifting up but an exalting: “God exalted him to his own right hand as Prince and Saviour” (Acts 5.31). Such an exaltation of Jesus, that is, a kind of spiritual lifting-up of the Son of God, comes as a response to, or perhaps a reward for, his selfless obedience to death upon the cross (Philippians 2.8-9).

Thus, there is something about Jesus descending to the lowest place of shame and suffering that enables his ascending to the highest place. His name was derided and mocked, but is now the name above all names. His body was broken and beaten, but is now glorified. He was low in the grave, but is now living forevermore in the highest place.

The way in which God seems to be positioned towards lifting up the One who was brought down, makes me think about a more general divine positioning in this upwards direction. Helpful biblical imagery like Israel being lifted on wings like an eagle’s out of slavery in Egypt (Exodus 19.4), and Mary’s proclamation that the Lord has “lifted up the lowly” (Luke 1.52), lead us to consider our own lives where God has surely been at work raising us out of all manner of negative situations. And of course, we hold on to the ultimate hope of finally being lifted up from death to that heavenly dimension where God reigns.

Thinking on these issues over the past few days, I was surprised to witness a kind of “sign” of this divine lifting-up in that most unusual biblical story of Ehud and King Eglon in Judges 3.12-30.

Clearly the story tells how Ehud liberates the Israelites from King Eglon of Moab. You may recall that Ehud is the Judge who shoves his short sword into the fat belly of King Eglon after saying, “I have a secret message for you from God”. He then escapes and leads Israel to destroy the Moabites, while the king’s servants wait outside the room thinking that their master is relieving himself!

A crucial part of the story – and the Israelite victory – is the total shaming of Moab as a weaker military force. The powerful King Eglon, able to draw together powerful support from Ammon and Amalek, is ultimately revealed to be a laughable, fat and fleshy character, easily defeated by the superior might of the hardy Ehud. The embarrassing feature of the king’s guards waiting outside the room, allowing Ehud to escape, shows the general foolishness of Moabites. And the death of 10,000 Moabites in a single day reveals the absolute power of Israel (when the LORD is with them of course!).

There is another well-attested interpretation of the story – that it is all innuendo – and the comic shaming of Moab is of a sexual nature. This should not be too much of a stretch of the imagination because, in the Israelite telling of history, Moab has been sexually shamed from the beginning. You recall the origin story in Genesis when Lot’s daughters sleep with their father in order to continue the family line (Gen. 19.30-38)? One of the children produced by this unsavoury act is the ancestor of the Moabites. Sexual shaming is a common and effective means of bringing down your enemy that people still engage in today.

So, here… and without dwelling too much on the details!…the soft and fleshy King Eglon is penetrated by Ehud’s short sword. In the world of ancient Israel this is the ultimate shaming: a man who is penetrated is not really a man at all. Further, the ancient near-eastern man could prove his dominant masculinity by sexually abusing another man. Again, we see this action threatened by men wishing to assert their dominance over male visitors to their town in Genesis 19.5 and Judges 19.22. And surely, this is at least partially why the men of Israel are commanded not to “lie with a male as one lies with a woman” (Leviticus 18.22): you cannot love your neighbour by shaming them and enacting dominance in such an abusive, violent way.

Either way – violently, comically or sexually – a crucial feature of the Ehud story is that Moab is humbled and shamed as unmanly, foolish, and weak. The Moabites have been forever condemned to the wrong side of history.

But then, far away from all this testosterone-driven fun and games… there is another Moabite called Ruth. In the book bearing her name she is referred to as “Ruth the Moabite” a number of times (e.g. 1.22; 2.2; 4.5) to make the point clear: the hero of this story is unexpected! Moabites are not supposed to be heroes in Israel’s story!

And this is exactly the point I am trying to make clear: it seems as though a central aspect of God’s activity is to lift up those who have been shamed and disregarded. Whoever they are! Even if they are an arch-enemy! As you know, Ruth is raised up from nothing within the book; saved by the noble-kinsmen Boaz as a perfect example of the biblical notion that those who are humbled will be exalted. And then, in the wider story of Israel she is lifted up to a much greater, much higher place as an ancestor to King David (4.16-22) who is ancestor to our Lord Jesus Christ. Ruth even appears in the genealogy of Christ (Matthew 1.5)!

Now, that is quite a turn-around for a Moabite! And this should mean more to us than just a mildly interesting piece of biblical trivia. As we have been adopted into the family of God, and dare to call Jesus our brother; we find ourselves mysteriously connected to those in his family-tree. Thus, we are linked to Ruth and her Moabite roots. As such, the intense shaming of Moab in stories like that of Judges 3.12-30 should cause us at least a moment of reflection about how we might approach these stories differently; how it seems that God may be a lot more willing to show mercy, bringing life and lifting-up, than we have previously thought; and how, when we judge and shame others, we are acting outside of the ways of the loving God we claim to follow.

Why does the Church continue to mark Ascension Day? I think because it highlights a fundamental way in which God works: not only raising up those who are down, forgotten, humbled; but ultimately lifting-up and exalting as well. 

 

 

Everything is Unexpected: Thinking Again About Samson (Judges 13-16)

The book of Judges has a repeating pattern where the Israelites do wrong in the eyes of the LORD, are subjected to a foreign oppressive power, cry out God and are delivered by a warrior Judge. This crying out to the LORD does not happen every time but is common enough to form a pattern (3.9; 4.3; 6.7; 10.10). The introduction of Samson in chapter 13 is notable because of the absence of any crying out to the LORD. It seems especially significant as the Israelites have suffered under the Philistines for forty years (13.1) – which is a pretty long time!

Thus, when the angel of the LORD appears to Manoah’s wife (no name provided, sorry…) with a message of a miraculous birth, it is a demonstration of the unprompted mercy of God for the people. The provision of this new deliverer for Israel stems from the good and righteous character of God seeking to aid the people in their distress (which apparently, they have brought upon themselves). The result of this merciful work of God is the provision of a most unexpected deliverer – Samson! The one with the incredible strength and long hair, who seems to be a most proud and foolish man, acting upon base instincts which, ultimately bring about his downfall at the hands of Delilah and the Philistines.

But I have been thinking recently about the unexpected saving action by God which takes place silently in the space between 13.1 and 13.2. It is unexpected because it is unsought by the people. Thus, I wonder if the unexpected nature of God’s deliverance leads in some way to the unexpected character of God’s chosen Judge, Samson. That is, without the people crying out and actively watching for deliverance, the LORD can work hidden in clear sight through the most unlikely of people. Thinking along these lines, I want to assume that everything Samson does in Judges 13-16 is in line with the divine purposes.

This may be easier to argue than we think: Samson’s birth is announced by the angel where is declared a nazirite who will begin the deliverance from the Philistines (13.3-5). The LORD is said to bless him as he grows (13.25) and the Spirit of the LORD comes upon Samson at least four times in the narrative (13.25; 14.6; 14.19; 15.14). These are clear signs surely, of someone with a special relationship with God: the miraculous birth, the vow, the vocation, not to mention the divine blessing and presence, are all there! God is at work!

So, while 14.1 may look like a man sharking, trying to pick-up girls (“while in Timnah, he noticed a girl among the Philistine women”); it could rather be the beginnings of Samson putting the divine work into practice. Recall that the deliverance from the Philistines is Samson’s vocation (13.5) and that is the work he sets about from 14.1 onward. However, the ways in which he goes about this work are always unexpected. Even his parents, who were told of this mission by the angel before Samson’s birth, do not understand what their son is up to (14.4). If they remembered the angel’s word to them in 13.5, the methods of their son, God’s chosen, are unorthodox, so as to confuse everyone!

Looking at the story from this perspective also enables us to see the famous betrayal by Delilah as mysterious or unexpected wisdom. What we tend to read as Samson’s “pride before a fall” might in fact be his journeying towards fulfilling what God has placed upon him. What appear to be Samson’s being overpowered by the Philistines as a result of his foolishness and being taken in by those dangerous feminine charms of Delilah, could actually be a demonstration of God’s chosen one giving himself over to obedience and consent to betrayal. This obedience requires Samson to act in such a way as to make the LORD depart from him when he breaks the nazirite vow placed upon him before his birth (16.20). Surely, this is a different kind of strength displayed by the man famous for his ability to tear lions apart (14.6)!

I wonder if Samson, understanding the divine purposes he has been invited to participate in, knows that he must leave his days of impressing with his strength and wit, and move towards becoming a pathetic figure; betrayed, with gouged-out eyes, mocked while dancing before his enemies (16.21-25).

These kinds of ideas may contribute to Samson’ inclusion (if only in passing) as one of the heroes of faith in Hebrews 11.32. The author of that letter recognises in Samson something similar to Abraham, Moses, and the other biblical names, who were sure of the things they hoped for, and certain of things they could not see. Perhaps Samson, because of the joy awaiting him, thought nothing of the disgrace of being overpowered, blinded, chained, and mocked by the Philistines. Perhaps, he had set his face towards the purposes of God in releasing Israel from their oppressors so as to stretch out his arms between the pillars and lose his own life for his people (16.28-30). He did not see what God had promised, but he had the faith to give himself over to that promise.

And here of course, we are led to see Christ who emptied himself in obedience, even to death on the cross. But looking back over this reflection on Samson, I think Jesus might have been present throughout.

There is no record of the nation crying out for deliverance at the time that the angel appeared to Mary with the news of a miraculous birth (Luke 1.26-38). As such, the Word could be made flesh and dwell among the people without it being clear that this was One who had been with God since the beginning and in fact, was God, until the hour had come! And again, most of what Jesus did was unexpected. In many ways, the man from Nazareth was the most unlikely of people to arrive proclaiming the kingdom of God. Anything people thought a prophet or a Messiah would do, he did not do. And what he did do amazed some of the crowds but often confused and angered other people; including his own family who at one point sought to have Jesus taken away for having “gone mad!” (Mark 3.20-21).

Unexpected as he and his ways may have appeared to those at the time, Jesus was always about his Father’s work and the Holy Spirit ever-present for him to teach and heal. This beautiful divine-human partnership led Jesus to set his face towards Jerusalem and, consenting to betrayal, give himself over to becoming a pathetic figure, mocked and beaten, hanging upon a cross.

Thinking about Samson and Jesus as we have here, I think we might be wise to carefully consider that in the kingdom of God everything is unexpected – and indeed, the Lord may be at work in the most unusual ways through the most unlikely of people… even us!

How do you recognise the real “living God”?: a lesson from the Apocrypha (Bel and the Dragon)

The Apocryphal tale Bel and the Dragon appears as chapter 14 of the book of Daniel in some Bibles, while elsewhere it is a part of a separate Apocrypha section. In any case it is an amusing tale of Daniel, now in the court of Cyrus the Persian, using his godly wisdom to overcome the Babylonian god Bel and an unidentified dragon deemed worthy of veneration.

As in the book of Daniel 1-6, Daniel is a respected companion of the foreign king. So, when asked by Cyrus, “why do you not worship Bel?”; Daniel laughs and tells the king he should not be deceived! The important issue here is that Daniel claims to worship the living God, the creator of all things. The king responds like this:

“Do you not think that Bel is a living god? Do you not see how much he eats and drinks every day?”

For Cyrus, the point of contention is that Daniel’s God may well be the living God, but how does that stop Bel from also being a living God? The difference in perspective is one of Daniel’s monotheism and Cyrus’ apparent polytheistic belief. Whereas Cyrus might acknowledge a number of divine beings worthy of worship, for Daniel, to worship the living God of Israel is to bow to no other. He is clear with the king that Bel is a human-made construction of clay and bronze. But Cyrus is equally clear: the evidence of life is in the eating and just look at Bel’s high levels of consumption each day!

Anyway, Daniel is able to show the king that it is fact not Bel but the priests who are eating and drinking all of the sacrifices presented to the god, by means of a secret entrance under the temple! As a result, Bel, its temple and its priests are destroyed by order of Cyrus. A god that does not eat, is not a living god at all.

However, the question is not yet sufficiently answered, and the king goes on to show Daniel a great (very-much-alive-and-most-definitely-not-just-a-statue-with-its-own-temple) dragon which the Babylonians revere, saying:

“You cannot deny that this is a living god, so worship him”

But again, Daniel replies that he worships the Lord, the living God; and gains permission from the king to try and kill the dragon “without sword or club”. Instead of these conventional weapons, Daniel mixes a concoction of pitch, fat and hair which, when eaten, causes the dragon to explode! Here, unlike Bel, it is the fact that the dragon eats which is the cause of its undoing!

Daniel’s victory is short-lived however. He has annoyed the Babylonians who pressurise the king into throwing his beloved companion into the… can you guess?… lions’ den!! To be thrown into the lions’ den once is unfortunate, but twice is just… well… anyway… And again, as readers we are faced with a foolish foreign king who, like Darius in Daniel 6, appears to have all the power but bends to public pressure quite easily.

But things have developed in the lions’ den business and this time around Daniel is in, not for just one night, but for six nights! Surely, there can be no escape – six nights, seven hungry lions – no way! Maybe no way for your average Babylonian wrongdoer, but Daniel has continually proclaimed his worship and service to the living God. And this is where we see whether this God actually proves to be any more “living” than Bel or the dragon.

Of course, God does deliver, and with some style. A prophet called Habakkuk back in Judea, having just cooked up a stew with some flat breads on the side, is whisked away by an angel over to Babylon in order to deliver dinner to Daniel starving in the lions’ den. After his hair-raising adventure (look at verse 36!), Habakkuk calls out: “Daniel, take the food that God has sent you”. And immediately the prophet is returned to Judea.

On the seventh day, King Cyrus comes to mourn for Daniel, finds him alive and well, and proclaims the greatness of Daniel’s God. Daniel is pulled out of the den and those who sought his destruction were thrown in and… “instantly eaten”!

What is revealed in this short little story, is that the true living God is in fact not the one who takes and consumes (as King Cyrus had assumed) but the One who gives to others. Notice how the divine power brings the prophet from afar to assist Daniel in his desperate situation. There is surely a lesson for us in remaining alert to the prompting of the Spirit to assist others in need of sustenance (in whatever form is necessary). The experience of the divine presence is easily missed and/or ignored, but if we keep our senses alert we may find ourselves swept along to deliver “the food that God has sent”. This way we will be doing the work of the living God.

We may also wish to consider that the true living God is not simply alive, in the sense of being more than a statue or idol. Rather, our Lord, the living God is life! And because God is life, God offers life to us in all manner of ways. Clearly, Christians believe we have been “raised to life with Christ” (Colossians 3.1). That is, the Word, the source of all life, became flesh, died, and then rose up to glorious new life. As we are invited to share in Christ’s death, we also share in his life. And it is an offer of life in its fullest sense. This suggests that in all the many ways in which we experience some kind of spiritual death – selfishness, pride, jealousy, you know the list – there is an offer of life, and an invitation to eat and live.

And finally, to move up another level, we might do well to recall that the true living God, far from taking for himself, is the One who offers himself so that we may receive and then give to others. In that most challenging text from John 6, Jesus says: “…whoever eats me will live because of me” (6.57). Make of that what you will, but the offer has been made!

In considering the character of the living God and trying to follow in the divine way of life demonstrated so perfectly by Jesus; the starting point seems to be a very ordinary, yet totally immense realisation that to truly live is to give and not to take.

Luke 19.1-10: A Personal Testimony and reflection

If I ever visit the Holy Land, I think I will head straight to Jericho. Because, in Jericho is a sycamore tree with a wall around it commemorating the story of Zacchaeus! Now, it may not be the actual tree that Zacchaeus climbed to see Jesus above the crowds as the miracle working teacher passed through the city some two thousand years ago… but it is certainly an old sycamore tree in the same city as the story. And that is good enough for me! Because I love the story of Zacchaeus and personally relate to it. Not because I am a tax collector, working for the Romans and cheating people out of their hard-earned money, but because of the way that I was so lost when the Lord came to seek and find me.

The story in Luke 19.1-10 is well-known but just as a quick reminder it goes something like this: Zacchaeus is a chief tax collector who wants to see Jesus who is passing through Jericho but has to climb up a tree in order to see the Lord over all the crowds. Jesus stops at the tree and tells Zacchaeus, “Hey! I am coming to your house today!” After meeting Jesus, Zacchaeus promises to repay anyone he has cheated four times over. The story ends with these famous words of Jesus: “Today salvation has come to this house… The Son of Man came to seek out and to save the lost” (19.9-10).

And for me, these words spoken by the Lord are the key to the story: it is a tale of lost and found much like those familiar parables of sheep, coins and sons in Luke 15.

Now, the first thing to note is about names. You know that biblical names are never just names but regularly tell us something about the character of the person. In this case, Zacchaeus means “righteous”. But there is a little problem… the “righteous” Zacchaeus has become “lost” along his way and is living one of the most unrighteous lives of first century Judea – a tax collector! We have all heard the stories about those tax collectors; working for the Romans, cheating their own people, universally hated and despised. That is why the parable in Luke 18 features a tax collector as the foil for the Pharisee: by using a contemporary example of unrighteousness, Jesus shocks his audience by exalting the tax collector above the Pharisee!

And, like the tax collector in the parable of chapter 18, Zacchaeus presents Jesus with another opportunity to challenge people’s expectations and judgments on who is good/bad and in/out. Although Zacchaeus has lost his way; after meeting with Jesus he lives up to his name of “righteous” and acts in a righteous manner towards those he has previously cheated. Zacchaeus is changed by his meeting with Jesus but does not become a different person. It is more like his innate character has been restored/saved/made good/made new! What I mean is: there was always righteousness inside of the one named “righteous” – God had created him as such – but the way of the world/bad choices/and who-knows-what-else resulted in his created core being lost. Jesus however, seeks and saves what has been lost. Righteousness is restored to the one named righteous.

As I already mentioned, this story speaks to me personally because I feel that “I once was lost and now am found”.

At the age of eighteen I had no knowledge and definitely no interest in anything religious. I knew that Christmas meant presents and Easter meant chocolate eggs. I could probably tell you something about Noah’s Ark. But that was about it! And then suddenly, I might say, utilising the language of Luke 19.1: “Jesus was passing through Jericho” and the things of God began to fascinate and surround me. It seemed as though everywhere I turned there was a church building I now found to be of great interest. I started to meet people who unexpectedly revealed they were Christians. And over the next year or so I became more and more interested in the man called Jesus. I wanted to find out about him, read books about him, listen to songs about him, and I suppose (in some spiritual sense!) I started climbing up the sycamore tree to try and see him over the crowds. By some divine mystery, the more I felt surrounded and pursued by the presence of the Lord, the more I was desperate to meet him in person!

How awesome to think of our Lord appearing or arriving where we are, looking for us. To me, all those years ago, that unexpected arrival of the divine presence was so irresistible, so attractive, I had to find out what – or who – was surrounding me. And I let him pursue me, I allowed myself to be sought and surrounded until that day at the age of twenty when I stopped, with no more hiding places, and said, “Alright Jesus, you’ve found me!”

Up until that time, I was lost. I had no idea who I was, what God had created me to be – or even that there was a God who had created me! I had no direction, no plans, no opinions, no drive. Looking back, I might equate myself to the earth in Genesis 1.1, a formless void waiting for God to speak words of life and light. That sounds extreme I know! But I believe that the Lord sought me and saved me from that dark void of an existence because I was so far away from living life in all its fulness. In fact, I am not sure that I was really living at all.

If we are to truly live however, Christians are required to give our lives away. In order for the Lord to restore and make new what has been lost in us, we have to release our grip on certain things that we have come to depend on, often over many years of living in the world. In my own story, being finally “found” by Jesus at age twenty was incredible and momentous, but it was only the start of something much bigger than I could possibly have imagined. It has taken a long time to even begin to realise what God created me to be – what illusions about my identity I have held on to so tightly – and the immense glory of what I am invited to step into. Indeed, to this very day I continue journeying towards understanding all that Jesus wants to “find”, restore and make good in me.

As such, I have come to believe that the Lord’s seeking and saving what has been lost is not a single event specifically related to becoming a Christian. Rather, I think this is one of the most important and relational ways in which the Lord works with and within us. In relationship with each other, as we follow in the way of Christ Jesus, he also continues to pursue us. And I am so grateful that he does! Look at those disciples on the road to Emmaus in Luke 24. They had been with the Lord all of that time but were now lost, heading in completely the wrong direction away from Jerusalem, when suddenly Jesus finds them on the road!

It may sound strange, but we can easily become lost as Christians and require finding again. And again. And again. People come to church (even a virtual online kind of a church!) carrying all kinds of burdens and experiences. Look at this wonderful verse from Psalm 119.176:

“I have gone astray like a lost sheep;

seek out your servant,

for I do not forget your commandments”

What a beautifully truthful verse of scripture this is! And how well it describes the situation I am speaking of! There are times when we still have faith, sing the songs, pray the prayers, try to love our neighbour, but still somehow go “astray like a lost sheep”. Of course, we are in a process of renewal and new creation, a step-by-step adventure of becoming more like Christ; but we are still subject to our own weaknesses as human beings. In the words of the hymn, Come Thou Fount of Every Blessing:

“Prone to wander Lord I feel it

Prone to leave the One I love”

Note the good news in the psalmist’s request: “seek out your servant”. We can ask that God may come to seek us out, because we know that this is how the Lord works! During those times when we feel so far from God, we know that our gracious, patient and kind Lord will not let us go, will not leave us or forsake us! Remember: “the Son of Man came to seek out and to save the lost” (Lk. 19.10). Nothing at all can separate us from the love of Christ – if we go astray and become lost, as we often do in ways both small and big – I am convinced that he will be working on the way of recovery, ready to draw us back to the presence so we may continue our journey together.

But I think we must allow ourselves to be found. If we stubbornly pursue our own way, blocking off our senses from the loving call of our Lord, we just cause damage to ourselves and delay the inevitable moment of joy when we become found once again. Even when we have wandered far from the Lord; even when we have gone backwards; I believe we can still recognise that presence of the divine as it draws near. Just like the voice of the shepherd is known by the flock, somehow the Lord’s presence will be familiar to us when we experience it afresh. The voice will be one that we know. The embrace will be comforting as it once was. And then… will we let ourselves be found again?

The reasons for our wandering are many – the pull of family, a new relationship, work commitments, temptations of the world we left behind, maybe just laziness and boredom. The reasons for our walking away from church are often real and painful – abusive church leaders, critical fellow Christians, questions about our faith that no one seems to be able to answer. But the One who pursued us in the first place, and rejoiced over finding us, is never done with us. In order that he might continue the work of restoring us to what we were created to be; taking us forwards to the fullest, best, most challenging expression of life, Jesus will prove faithful when we are faithless, and he will heal when we are in pain.

However far away you may feel, you are within easy reach of the hand of the Lord.

If today you hear his voice, please do not harden your heart (Psalm 95.7-8), but respond, allow yourself to be found, and receive the joyous welcome as our Lord says again over you: “Today, salvation has come to this house!” (Luke 19.9).

Betrayal in Paradise: how men prefer to interpret Genesis 3

This week I have been reading the Proto-Gospel of James (which, by the way is well worth a read!). This second century CE text imaginatively reports the birth of Mary to faithful parents Anna and Joachim; her childhood in the temple; the miraculous choosing of Joseph to be Mary’s husband; and the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem.

Joachim and Anna are presented in a classic pseudo-biblical style. Absolutely faithful to God but unable to have children until the time is right and the Lord delivers them a baby girl! When Mary is born, she is taken to the temple where she spends her childhood, holy and pure and adored by all. At age twelve, Mary can no longer remain at the temple but must be married, so all the eligible bachelors are assembled, and a dove arises out the staff of a man called Joseph showing he is the one to take Mary home as his wife! After a while though Joseph remembers he has unfinished carpentry work outside of town so he leaves Mary saying, “the Lord will watch over her”. And that is where the trouble starts…

Chapter 13 tells how, in Joseph’s absence, an angel appears to Mary and says… OK, you know what the angel says; I’m going to skip ahead… Joseph returns home to find Mary six months pregnant. He weeps bitterly, tears his clothes, and says:

“Has not the entire history of Adam been summed up in me? For just as Adam was singing praise to God, the serpent came and found Eve alone, and led her astray. This too has now happened to me.”

What Joseph perceives is a betrayal of the most primordial kind. Mary, left alone, has been led astray in the manner of that first woman, Eve. What interests me here, is that with such a perception, Joseph steps into very familiar interpretive territory.

The central idea is that Adam is far away from any serpent-related activity. Note how Joseph aligns himself with Adam who was apparently, “singing praise to God”. It seems that Joseph’s act of “praise to God” is obediently taking in Mary when he could have refused. But the notion of Adam being the innocent bystander, or even an innocent victim, appears many times. Here are two examples:

If we turn to Book IX of Milton’s 1667 epic Paradise Lost, we find Adam trying to convince Eve to remain at his side because, “safest and seemliest by her husband stays, who guards her, or with her the worst endures”. However, Eve is eager to wander. And at the hour of temptation when she reaches for the fruit, Adam is far away, innocently, “waiting desirous her return”.

In 2 Corinthians 11.2-3, Paul from a distance and physically unable to assist, writes of his concern that the Corinthians are going to be led astray from a “pure devotion to Christ” in the manner of Eve and the serpent.

In these examples, there is the perception of a betrayal in the relationship. Note that we are viewing the situation each time from the male viewpoint and, each time it is the male partner who has been wronged. Each of the three (Joseph, Milton’s Adam, and the Apostle Paul) are presented as faithful and loving. They are committed to the relationship. They even allow their partners freedom – they leave them alone to wander; they trust that all will be well. But look what happens – betrayal!

In Paradise Lost, while Adam waits for Eve, he “had wove of choicest flowers a garland, to adorn her tresses, and her rural labours crown”. The man is smitten, in love, making a daisy chain for his companion! And then later, when they meet, and she hands him the enticing fruit; he accepts: “against his better knowledge; not deceived but fondly overcome with female charm”. So hopelessly all-consuming is Adam’s love for Eve, that he must join her in rebellion against that which he knows to be right.

In a similar way in 2 Corinthians, Paul feels a “divine jealousy” as he had promised the Corinthians as a “chaste virgin” in marriage to Christ. But now he is overcome with fear that the serpent’s cunning will again strike. And he is not around to save them.

But for all this wronged romantic hero whining, it is not actually clear from Genesis 3 that the pair were separated at all.

“The two of them were naked yet felt no shame. Now the serpent was the shrewdest of all the creatures God had made. He said to the woman, ‘did God really say…?’” (Genesis 2.25-3.1)

“…She took of its fruit and ate. She also gave some to her husband who also ate. Then the eyes of both of them were opened…” (Genesis 3.6-7)

Now, from this reading it just does not seem to me that they were apart when the forbidden fruit eating took place. Indeed, we have just learned in 2.24 that they were “one flesh”. It looks a lot more likely that the men have got their interpretive heads together and discovered an angle from which to understand the story. This interpretive angle is very useful in fact any time the man is feeling wronged or wounded in someway and wishes to demonstrate his innocence.

The bigger picture of course, is that men wish to separate themselves, not only from the actual moment of Eve’s being led astray, but also from its devastating consequences. And as a result, you find passages like this from the Apocryphal work Sirach 25.24:

“From a woman sin had its beginning and because of her we all die”

Returning to Joseph in the Proto-Gospel of James now. Despite his appalled distancing himself from Mary’s seeming betrayal and aligning himself with an idealised Adam who was somewhere praising God; by alluding to Genesis 3, Joseph does in fact become Adam without realising it.

Recall in Genesis 3.8-14 when the LORD is heard strolling through the garden and the human pair hide themselves. God questions Adam who replies, “the woman you put at my side – she gave me of the tree and I ate”. It is a lame attempt to pass the blame onto the one who up until very recently been “bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh” (2.23). And Eve then blames the serpent, and the human history of not-my-fault begins!

I see something of this in Joseph’s response to Mary when he says:

“You who have been cared for by God; why did you do this? Have you forgotten the Lord your God? Why have you humiliated your soul…?”

In his accusatory blaming of Mary, Joseph inadvertently steps into the role of Adam that he had earlier claimed for himself in a very different manner.

Adam and Eve, Mary and Joseph, even Paul and his Corinthian church, we are joined together with those we love. In such loving relationships we have all experienced those moments where we have played the injured party – the tragically wronged innocent – and sometimes we have had valid reason to do so. And in those moments, it can feel as though we have been betrayed in paradise. However, every relationship made up of two is in fact a three – a trinity if you like! The divine presence which we know as the Holy Trinity (Father, Son and Spirit) surely joins with us and binds us together. Just as God physically formed and then breathed life into that first human pair, we might think of our own loving relationships created and sustained by the divine presence.

As such it seems crucial to attend to this third partner who will surely guide us towards love, gentleness, forgiveness, and remind us that just as we are joined together in the paradise before the fall, we remain “one flesh” after it as well.

Deception in the name of the LORD (2 Kings 10.18-28)

My question today is: why does the Bible feature so much deceit in the name of the LORD?

It seems obvious that truth is a central part of the Christian way of life. Our Lord Jesus Christ even says of himself: “I am the way, the truth and the life” (John 14.6). And there is also the small matter of the Ten Commandments “You shall not bear false witness” (Exodus 20.16)… which, although clearly related to some legal practice, is generally interpreted as saying “don’t tell lies”!

As such, it is interesting to me that the Bible features many examples of deceit done in the name of the LORD. The particular text which has prompted my thought today is 2 Kings 10.18-28.

This is the story of Jehu who has been divinely mandated to set things right in Israel and erase the memory of Ahab. After arranging the death of the seventy sons (and collecting their heads in bags) and killing of other family members of Ahab, we come to 10.18-28 where Jehu calls the people together and declares: “Ahab served Ba’al a little, Jehu shall serve him much!” With these words Jehu gathers all the Ba’al prophets together for a great day of worship but ends up having them all killed instead. The Israelite king has no intention of honouring Ba’al. It has all been a trick designed to destroy the Ba’al worshippers (10.19).

Now, this makes me wonder whether or not truth should be a priority when doing God’s work. It is complicated here with Jehu because after slaughtering the Ba’al prophets, the king is praised by the LORD and promised a four generations long reign (10.30). It seems that the work of setting things right in Israel, that is, erasing the wrongs of Ahab, was of such great importance due to God’s immense love for Israel (e.g. Deuteronomy 7.7-9); the actual manner by which this was achieved is less important.

Perhaps, there is always an overall purpose of God in any situation. That is to say that the divine presence in this world desires to make something good and new out of every circumstance. But God’s purposes are brought about in partnership with a human agent (which, as we know from the Bible and our own experiences, can be the most unlikely of people!). Because humanity is somehow less-than-perfect, the human partner responding to the call of the Lord will always play their part in a less-than-perfect manner. Nevertheless, as God is always positioned towards mercy, grace, and patience, being abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness (Exodus 34.6); our rather pathetic efforts to carry out the divine work in which we have been invited to participate may still be celebrated by a loving heavenly parent.

In light of this thought, I would like to quickly consider some other biblical examples:

In Genesis 27, Rebekah convinces Jacob to trick the elderly Isaac into giving his fatherly blessing to the wrong son! Jacob dresses as his older brother Esau and receives the blessing. The act of deception is cruel but seemingly inevitable as Esau had earlier given up his first-born rights for a pot of stew (25.27-34). Further, although appearing as a mean trickster, pitting one son against the other, it might just be that Rebekah actually has a sense of the mysterious divine purpose and aligns herself to its fulfilment. Recall that, when pregnant, she inquired of the LORD and received the prophetic word that “the older will serve the younger” (25.22).

The story of the midwives in Exodus 1.15-21 is well-known. Because they fear the LORD, they will not follow the Pharaoh’s instruction to kill any boy that is born. When questioned, the midwives concoct a story about the speedy delivery rates of Hebrew women, resulting in their always missing the birth! The blessing they receive from the LORD is surely because their deception is in line with the larger purpose of God. As midwives, they are in the business of life not death, as presumably is God. The Israelites are an oppressed minority; slaves crying out to their Saviour. By saving the baby boys, the midwives step into the work of God. And of course, one of those boys might prove to be God’s chosen, Moses who will lead the people out of slavery to freedom.

And lastly, in the Apocryphal book of Judith, the Israelites are a community oppressed, this time by the mighty power of Assyria. Judith acts deceptively to overcome the army commander Holofernes. Here she prays for God to bless her deceptive words in order for the enemy of Israel to be defeated. And again, it appears that God is indeed on the side of the powerless, the weak, the small, and one woman, Judith brings victory to Israel over the might of Assyria by speaking not even one word of truth!

So, I wonder if it is possible to align oneself with the divine purposes using any means – even stepping into the grey area between truth and lies, or into complete deception. I cannot think of many contemporary Christians affirming such an idea!

And here I turn to look at Jesus. The Word, who was with God and was God, became flesh and dwelt among us. He is the One about whom we can be sure lives the divine purposes because, “I and the Father are one”. But how did the person of Jesus of Nazareth actually present God-with-us?

The answer in the Gospel accounts is that often Jesus’ identity is clouded in secrecy and occasional, possible deception. Consider for instance, the times people are instructed not to tell anyone what has happened to them (e.g. Mark 1.44; 8.30). Whatever the reasons for this secrecy, the Son of God does not wish to be publicly known. Elsewhere, Jesus seems to purposely speak in ways designed to confuse or deceive. In John 7, when challenged by his brothers about attending the festival, Jesus says that he will not go… and then goes, but in secret (7.7-10). And he is said to speak only in parables so that the people may look and not see, listen but not understand (Mark 4.12).

So much for the words of Jesus. But his divine-human identity is also difficult to comprehend from his appearance. When walking on the water Jesus is perceived by the disciples to be a ghost (Mark 7.49), and the same is said when he appears after the resurrection (Luke 24.37). At the Transfiguration, the physical appearance of Jesus is changed beyond recognition as he becomes glorified (Mark 9.2). Jesus is not recognised on the road to Emmaus (Luke 24.16) and thought of as the gardener on Easter morning (John 20).

The way in which the Gospels’ presentation of Jesus blends changes in physical appearance with tricky language and demands for secrecy should serve to point us towards further exploration of the divine character and purposes in our own lives. Maybe one of the reasons that God’s people are allowed – encouraged at times – to use deceptive means of participating in the divine work to which they have been called, is that the character and purposes of the Lord are not straightforward. Certainly not as easy to understand and obvious as we sometimes tell ourselves!

Maybe, a part of figuring out how best to respond to the call of God when it comes to us is to engage in the search for the God who sometimes hides from view, the Son who acts in secret and speaks in parable, and the Spirit who blows where it will. This Holy Trinity we are committed to serving and following will undoubtedly lead us in an adventurous dance of extremes stretching us far beyond anything remotely comfortable so that we are forced to rethink even what is truth and what is not.

Judith in the Bathtub!: a Lesson from the Apocrypha

Here I am looking at the Apocryphal book of Judith and pointing to a particular theme which contemporary Christians might find helpful.

The Assyrians have been displaying their immense might and have finally closed in on Israel, cutting off the water supply of the town of Bethulia. At this crucial point in proceedings, with the town elders floundering, Judith comes out of her quiet existence as a pious widow with a clear plan to save the people. She has fasted and observed a religious life for exactly three years and four months, so it is clear that Judith is spiritually well prepared for this moment – her moment when she will partner with God to bring salvation to Israel.

After boldly telling the elders how the Lord is going to deliver Israel by her hand, Judith then cries out to God asking for divine assistance and blessing on her plans. Perhaps we recognise in our own lives the clear tension between public proclamation of faith and the private pleas to the Lord when we acknowledge the risks ahead and the courage needed to do what God asks of us.

Now, what lays ahead for Judith is a crazy, comic mission literally into the enemy camp where she will deceive her way into gaining the trust of Holofernes, the Assyrian army commander. She has prayed: “By the deceit of my lips… crush their arrogance by the hand of a woman” (9.10); and she will go out to convince the Assyrian oppressors that she has abandoned the sinking ship of Bethulia because of the peoples’ sins and wishes to show Holofernes the way “by which he can go and capture all the hill country without losing one of his men, captured or slain” (10.13).

Of course, Judith’s mission is a success! Holofernes ends up dead with his head in a bag, while his army is left in confusion for the Israelites to claim victory. But, back to Judith’s prayers and preparations in chapter 10, she cannot know for sure that this is how it will turn out. As I said, there is a real tension involved with faith: we may trust that God is with us, but we still require the courage to face the actual situation. And that is why I was interested to see that, having cried out to God for help in the work that lay ahead of her:

“[Judith] bathed her body and anointed herself with precious anointment” (10.3)

First, recall that the water supply to the town has been cut off by the Assyrians (7.17) so for Judith to bathe at this point is either the grossest kind of selfishness or an act of the greatest importance. Knowing from chapters 8-9 that she is righteous and godly, and presented as pretty much perfect in every way, it has to be the latter! Which leads to the question of why she needs to bathe so urgently at a time of no water.

Judith is preparing herself for the work that lays ahead. She has been preparing for this moment of calling for three years and four months of religious observance. Now, as the hour has come, it seems to me that she must observe a kind of ritual washing, perhaps a kind of baptism. But if this is a kind of bathtub baptism, what is Judith actually preparing herself for? And what might this section of the story be pointing us towards?

Here I want to turn to Romans 6 where Paul writes, “all of us who have been baptised into Christ Jesus were baptised into his death…” (6.3). There is something profound here about which Martin Luther wrote in 1519, “the life of Christians, from baptism up to the grave, is nothing but the commencement of a blessed dying…”. That is, in the way that we live, those of us purporting to be followers of Christ must somehow give ourselves up to follow our Lord all the way to his death. Indeed, we must be willing to lose our life in order to save it (Mark 8.35). Going down into the waters of baptism is a good symbol of that sinking down, sharing in the death of Christ Jesus.

Of course, there is a rising up on the other side! As Paul goes on to write to the Roman church: “if we have been united with him in death like his, we will certainly be united with him in resurrection like his” (6.5). But before this glorious rising up out of the baptism waters into new life, we have to willingly go down into the darkness. Not knowing for certain, but trusting by faith, that the light will follow.

I see a sign of this in Judith’s bathing as preparation. To go into the enemy’s camp by faith is to step into the darkness. She will risk it all for the sake of her people. She is prepared to lay down her life for her friends, an act of the greatest love.

But I will go a little further in considering Judith 10.3. After bathing, she “anointed herself with precious anointment”. If baptism is to go down, giving oneself over to death; anointing with oil, spices or anointment is another step towards actually preparing the body for burial. Recall the story towards the end of all four Gospels where the woman (named Mary in John 12.3) pours an expensive oil upon Jesus. While the disciples complain at the waste, Jesus says, “she has anointed my body beforehand for its burial” (Mark 14.8).

What I suggest then, is that, within this Apocryphal text of Judith, we are pointed towards a great spiritual truth of the Christian way. In following Christ Jesus, we must go down into the waters of baptism and anoint our bodies for burial, because the journey of discipleship leads towards the cross. And in varying degrees of spiritual or physical risk, it may do so many times over.

OK, there are periods – sometimes long stretches of time – when this idea has no relevance to us at all. God’s voice is silent, or at least very quiet beyond perhaps a mild prompting to pray for this or that. But this is exactly the time – our “three years and four months” if you like – when we must try to develop faithful practices of prayer and reflection. Without this regular devotion in everyday, ordinary time when we get to know the ways of the divine, we may be taken by surprise by the call of the Lord when it comes, and find ourselves completely overwhelmed, unable to respond with obedience.

Because, when the call of the Lord comes, we might find ourselves invited to something that we feel is beyond us. The work God has for us might just demand everything we have to give. The time spent in prayer and preparation now, is like training for that call, that invitation, that work from the Lord. Of course, we are always able to refuse the call of the Lord. God is gracious, and experience tells me that we will not be condemned for walking away. However, we know – I mean really know – that the better way is to align ourselves with Christ Jesus. It will never be the easy way, but it will be better for us and for the community we serve. Thus, if we, like Judith, observe some form of regular religious life, when the Lord’s call comes we are much more likely to be ready and willing to bathe and anoint, saying, “let us also go, that we may die with him” (John 11.16) (– in whatever way those words are meaningful to us!).

~~~~~~~

The good news is that the other side of the dark water of baptism is the light when we arise! Likewise, Jesus’ body anointed for burial, was absent from the tomb on Easter morning! And Judith, having gone into the darkness of the enemy’s camp, prepared to give up her life for her people, is later blessed by all her meet her:

“You are blessed by the Most High God above all other women on earth; and blessed be the Lord God, who created the heavens and the earth, who guided you to cut off the head of the leader of our enemies. Your praise will never depart from the hearts of those who remember the power of God. May God grant this to be a perpetual honour to you, and may he reward you with blessings, because you risked your own life when our nation was brought low, and you averted our ruin, walking in the straight path before our God” (Judith 13.18-20)

And so, with such joy set before us, I wonder if we are prepared at all to “run with perseverance the race that is set before us” (Hebrews 12.1-2)?

Creation, Equality, Consent in Genesis 1-2 and Paradise Lost Book IV

In Book IV of John Milton’s 1667 epic Paradise Lost, Satan travels around the garden observing all of God’s creatures. This is where he first views the human beings:

“the Fiend saw… two of far nobler shape, erect and tall… in naked majesty seemed lords of all; and worthy seemed; for in their looks divine…though both not equal, as their sex not equal seemed

What interests me here is the question of the seeming equality of the human pair. As Satan looks on, it is unclear whether the two humans are equal as “lords of all”, just seem equal, or perhaps seem unequal! And should we trust in Satan’s judgement of anything anyway?

But the uncertainty within Milton’s poem highlights the larger difficulty in understanding the status of male and female from the creation narratives in Genesis 1 and 2: are we created equally?

Of course, the creation of humankind by God is one of the most important aspects of Christian thought. In Genesis 1 and 2 we learn that male and female were created in the Image of God, formed from the earth by the LORD’s hand and given life by divine breath. And this tells us who we are – essentially, beloved children of God. But if only it remained so simple! The manner in which the creation of human beings described in Genesis 2 differs from chapter 1 has caused problems in understanding the value/status/worth of male and female.

In 1.27 humanity is presented as created equally in the Image of God: “male and female God created them”. There are no apparent issues of hierarchy between the two as both are blessed and told to be fruitful, etc. (1.28-30). But then in 2.21-22, because Eve is described as being created after Adam, certain parts of the Church have felt prompted to develop ideas of women as inferior creatures. Consider for example, this from 1 Timothy 2.12-13:

“I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve…

Despite the obvious differences between the accounts in Gen. 1 and 2, I think that the equality in creation of male and female evident in 1.27, may also be seen in chapter 2.

We must first consider a little word: ha’adam. This is the Hebrew term from Genesis 2 often translated in English as “the man” but is in fact more reflective of “the human/the earthling” and elsewhere, humanity in a general sense. Importantly, this term points to the relationship between ‘adam (human) and ‘adamah (earth). That is, the human is formed out of the earth (2.7), and God is revealed as creating by using creation. This notion is developed even further in 2.21-22 when the one ‘adam is the basis for two‘ish (man) and ‘isshah (woman).

When we look at the text this way, taking care to note the words used, we are able (I think) to find a meeting point in the creation of humanity in both chapters 1 and 2. Let me put it this way:

Male and female are created equally in the divine image. One way to appreciate this is to think of the one human creature (‘adam) becoming two, man (‘ish) and woman (‘isshah).

However convincingly I have argued the case for equality in creation, it is clear that the world does not operate in such a way and both religious and secular communities have traditionally set male above female. Although in the West this has been challenged in recent years, I think Christians can be helped further in reflecting on issues of equality by considering the notion of consent.

So, with this in mind, let us return to Milton’s Paradise Lost Book IV where we find Eve speaking to Adam:

“With that thy gentle hand seized mine; I yielded”

Eve here describes a moment in the pair’s first meeting when Adam’s hand which, though “gentle”, still “seized” hers. A dominating action for sure. And her response? To yield to him and consent to be his partner. This is extremely important when considering equality in creation from Genesis 1-2. Because this act of consent takes place before “the fall”, it reveals Eve’s confidence in who she is as a child of God. She can allow Adam his assumed authority because she knows the pair of them are truly equal. Nothing has yet happened to challenge this belief. I might put it this way:

In that perfect garden, Eve consented to be Adam’s companion. But in our imperfect world, that original consent on Eve’s part has been presumed as “natural” inferiority.

From this small section of a seventeenth century poem I wish to draw out a major point about consent. While primarily thinking in terms of male and female, the issues around equality in creation extend to all aspects of human relationships: age, gender, ethnicity, sexuality, and so on. To accept that we are all created equally in the divine image is to accept also that power is assumed by one group over another and is therefore, something of a permitted illusion. When Milton’s Eve yielded to Adam she did not do so as an inferior acknowledging her superior, but as an equal consenting to his assumed authority. And that giving of consent is a non-violent display of true power.

Recall Jesus, apparently at the mercy of Pilate who says, “do you not know that I have the power to release you and the power to crucify you?” (John 19.10). Jesus replies, “you would have no power over me unless it had been given to you from above” (19.11). Here, Jesus Christ, the Word through whom all things were made (John 1.1-3), calls out the reality behind Pilate’s authority while at the same time consenting to that same authority. He has emptied himself completely and consented to what human hands would do to him. But, crucially, the decision comes from him: “I lay down my life… no one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (John 10.17-18).

Just like Eve in Paradise Lost, Jesus truly knows who he is and therefore is able to consent to the assumed power that others hold over him. I wonder how close we are to that position when so often we find ourselves crying out: “Acknowledge my contribution! Respect my position! Notice what I do!” We have to feel that we are more important than those around us simply because we have no security in who we are and as a result, we give nothing away. We are incapable of allowing someone else their moment because we are desperately hunting for our own.

If we really believe in our status as children of God – bearers of the divine image – lovingly created with plans and purposes unique to us an individuals, this should give us the confidence to release our grip on all those things we cling to: status, recognition, power, respect, and so on. Realising that we are all in fact utterly equal in creation releases us from the need for these illusory comforts. It brings us back to the perfect garden in paradise. It makes us truly free!

But acknowledging the equality in our created sex-skin colour-ethnicity-whatever comes at a great cost because it gives us the freedom to give ourselves to others and effectively lose our lives. Indeed, with this Kingdom of God type of freedom we are invited (in all kinds of different ways) to permit the one who has slapped our right cheek to also slap our left (Matthew 5.39).

Do we actually want that kind of freedom?